Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey L Minch's avatar

In addition to term limits -- House/Senate 12 years, combined no more than 16 years -- there should be age limits.

Strom Thurmond, the oldest serving member of the Senate who served until age 100, was a stud having landed on D Day in a glider as part of the follow on wave of the 82nd Abn Div.

Nobody should be in Congress beyond age 75. It is simply a matter of energy and intellectual vigor.

Absolutely, go to the defined contribution model. Defined benefit is a dinosaur and absurdly expensive.

Make politics part time again.

JLM

www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com

Expand full comment
Illinois Entrepreneur's avatar

Pretty good arguments.

The best counterargument that I've heard is that without experienced members of Congress the bureaucracy and lobbyists will steamroll the rookies due to unfamiliarity with DC. A good case of this would be Trump's first term when he even admits he had no idea how diabolical DC was to resist his agenda.

But a lot of that was pre-Chevron, which has now changed the calculus and power structure back in favor of the People's representatives and away from the bureaucracy.

With the new post-Chevron doctrine of limited administrative powers, I am more inclined to support term limits as you have laid them out.

Nice work.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts