Leftist need to learn that if they dish it out they better be able to take it and you reap what you sow. If you utilize inflammatory rhetoric to incite violence you deserve to get violence in return. Years ago many told me that I should start a podcast because I was able to get along with people on the left and the right due to my background having worked in both parties, but over the past half decade or so I have lost nearly all my patience and tolerance for the crack pots whose hatred for one man's personality and conservatives in general has them rationalizing and justifying inappropriate speech and conduct. Their failure to recognize that no matter how deep their feelings may be about something, they are not justified in violence, has led to an incitement of violence and that is irrefutable. Therefore I've made it clear and put in writing on my social media accounts that if you ever refer to me as a fascist or a Nazi that I will consider it an act of self-defense to beat the living crap out of you. It is about survival now. If you think that's a bit of an extreme viewpoint, you are rapidly becoming part of a minority who is refusing to face reality. All you have to do is look at some of the insane rantings and ravings and ramblings of emotionally unhinged liberals over the past few months and you'll see my words have merit.
Jeff, words and civil discourse have not worked ever since the Obama era, because the old adage: "You cannot reason with an unreasonable person" has never been more evident.
Just like the only effective deterrent to terrorism is overwhelming Force, so too the only effective deterrent to inflammatory rhetoric leading to incitement of violence is to punish the offender in such a painful way that they never try that crap again. They're entitled to think and feel whatever the hell they want, but they cannot speak and act without consequence and thus far, the consequences have not been effective enough. I have been responsible for, either individually or as a part of a group, more than 30 people losing their jobs since October 7th of 2023 and I will continue to bust my ass to make sure that continues.
Likewise, conservatives need to see to it that liberal journalists, politicians, teachers and social media trolls are held accountable for unacceptable behavior, including speech, in ways that are painful. Yes you have free speech without legal recourse (unless of course, you are advocating nondefensive violence) but there's a difference between legal recriminations and professional and personal ones and where we need to get better as conservatives is in dishing out personal and professional consequences to these tin foil hat wearing, violence advocating lunatics.
Let me suggest that we encourage investigation and prosecutions of the groups funding the Left--Soros, Antifa, etc.
I do have idea which I think might help with the rogue district judge injections. Trying to find the correct person to help me propose this to someone with enough of a platform or power to advance it. Let me know here if you are interested/could help. We'd need fearless trial lawyers
I have been informed that there are currently multiple ongoing investigations into rogue District judges as well as multiple leftist extremist groups and ironically, the President I believe today stated the same thing regarding the leftist groups.
Both Open Society and Code ptink are part of ongoing investigations. This week more will be added, if they have not been already.
The leftist extremist groups are more immediate concern at the moment and therefore, receiving the majority of the labor intensive investigation efforts.
I did request, and was met with a positive reception, an investigation into Judge Boasberg's conflicts of him ruling on policy matters that would impact his wife's and his daughter's affiliations with liberal NGO groups, in particular, illegal immigration
This is good news and obviously, the focus on leftist terrorist groups makes sense.
My idea is to assemble plaintiffs for a class action suit against the rogue district judges. Be sure to assemble plaintiffs from each of the districts with obstructing judges--whose "restraining orders" are unconstitutionally applied across the entire country (district judges don't have the power to act nationally).
-->"I don’t appreciate a lot of Trump’s language toward the opposite side either. It’s not helpful. It’s one of the things I dislike about Trump and will not defend him on"
I'm seriously curious as to what you would recommend be Trump's messaging style? He's confronted with a hostile and opposition media, and Democrat opponents who bewail him with epithets. The go-along to get-along approach used by Republicans in the past resulted in getting steam-rolled by media and Democrats. He seems to have learned from his first term, and is intent to set his agenda, letting others respond to it--rather than responding to the agenda others' set.
I don't think calling Jerome Powell an idiot was very constructive. Instead he could have pointed out the negative affects of high interest rates. Insulting Powell is not a good look. Now if we're talking about the fake news media and the Adam Schiffs of the world I fully support his style.
Or making up shoolyard names for them, like he did for DeSantis. But it goes deeper than that. He is a study in contradictions - f.i., he is not a principled capitalist.
The left tried to kill him, imprison him, bankrupt him, and silence him. President Trump has shown incredible restraint in how he has responded to the war against him and his family. President Trump cannot respond like a President Reagan would have, as President Reagan’s America is dead. Our culture has become much more coarse since the 1980s, so I have zero issue with how President Trump speaks.
But I do have a huge problem on how the Republicans in Congress speak. They need to up their game against the leftists who want us all dead. They are currently failing in how they are responding to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
There is lots of talk about Civil War 2.0. Seems far fetched, but you will get Civil War 2.0 from the people if the government does not assert its legal power against the violent leftist death cults. They need to be crushed through legal justice. Unconditional surrender is how America wins wars.
The choice right now is between civilization vs. chaos, and the speech needs to match the existential struggle we are in.
The persecution of Trump is beyond belief and it started in the Obama White House at the Resolute desk. I agree more with you than you do with yourself.
The continued persecution of President Trump was pre-ordained when Obama chose to keep a Washington residence after his term was over. Obama unleashed the evil we are living with, so we must act accordingly. As they say, “when you meet the devil, he won’t have horns and a tail”.
Obama’s legacy must be reduced to dust and scattered to the four winds. Let’s start with all the NGOs he used. Salt every single field Obama stepped on. We can’t exile him, but we can treat him as if he’s been exiled.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply--with which I agree. It's not the '80s and Congressional Republicans rely far too much on their historic go-along to get-along approach. Queensberry Rules Republicans get rolled every time--never learning from experience. The political world is dominated by the tenor inflicted by Democrats and Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals." Every Republican should learn them and abide them. And to anticipate a criticism, learning those simple rules is realism--not becoming what your enemy is. Play the game as it presents itself, or retreat to the sidelines and live with the outcome. It's up to you.
You can be forceful without the cheap shot name calling. It's like cursing. It demeans the conversation. Saying the F word or "shite" a lot doesn't make you tough or look tough. It makes you look like a poser. I was an engineer in a pervious life and I know all the words and can string them together pretty well. But it doesn't really accomplish anything. Churchill was a forceful communicator. Maybe he cursed a lot in private but not in his speeches. It distracts from the point. People concentrate on the name calling and not the point you are trying to make. Counter productive.
Trump uses controversial and even insulting speech to get the legacy/MSM to cover an issue. Otherwise these outlets--really just leftist appendages--either don't include the story or smother it.
Obama and his ilk were schooled in the toxic and far left ideologies of former Weatherman Bill Ayres. (remember they too bombed and killed people. And his compadre, Bernadine Dorn, is, iirc a professor!). Their project to control all the institutions of our society has been largely successful in hoodwinking and propagandizing a large (plurality? majority?) portion of Western society including in the USA.
God knows their hearts. But remember that while Jesus asked us to be gentle as doves He also admonished us to be wise as serpents. I can see the evil of the Left and their "leaders". So if Trump talks brashly or "offensively"...I remember not just what he is confronting, but the dire necessity of saving our country.
True but they wind up covering the way he said it and not the what he said.. It gives them an opportunity to avoid the main topic(s) by concentrating on the language he uses. I think the term Stray Voltage arose (in the political context) during Obama's time in office. When Trump does his shtick, the media concentrate on the stray voltage and his point gets lost in the noise. Calling Powell someone "vermin" doesn't really accomplish much. Calling them incompetent or inept, or not up to the job gets the same message across. The message should be the message. The story should be about the message. Not about the word choice or phrasing of the message.
That's a fair critique. I think 'counter-productive' would be our host's description as well.
Trump is his own man, so I won't offer a defense of his approach. As a rule, I don't have much time to devote to listening to politicians, rather than that which they accomplish, or forward as their policies. Cheers.
All politicians are by their nature actors (All the world's a stage so to speak) Their public persona often differs from their private persona. See JFK, FDR, etc. I believe in the past they were more true to themselves. Teddy Roosevelt the politician was probably closer to Teddy Roosevelt the person than FDR was. Sometimes the gap is large (JFK) sometimes smaller. Trump does his thing because it works, the majority of his base likes it, he doesn't overplay it, and he has the accomplishments to back it up. Referring to your comment about accomplishments and moving forward his policies.
I think it's closer to who he really is then let's say Biden or just about any D now. In the first Avenger movie Captain America says to Iron Man: We need a plan of attack. Iron Man replies I have a plan. CA asks him what it is. He replies "Attack". Every time I hear that I think of Trump. Trump is very different from his R predecessors and in particular both Bush's. Maybe that's exactly what the party needs now. Maybe that's exactly what this country needs. At any rate I doubt he is going to change. Cheers and Good wishes.
In case you hadn't seen it, here's Bill Maher after he had dinner with Trump in April. BTW, I don't watch Maher but know his tendencies via years of seeing clips from his HBO show. You could say Maher was forthright and honest--and yet it apparently had no effect on the woke/prog/left in this country.
I read about it. My hearing is so bad that unless it's CC I don't watch anything. X needs CC! I didn't watch this even though YouTube does have CC's, because I don't care for Maher. Nothing political, I just don't think he's funny or even mildly amusing. His timing is all wrong. It's TV timing and by that I mean waiting for the Applause sign to flash so the audience will start clapping and\or laughing. Tell a joke, wait, look around.... I suspect if they got rid of the Applause sign there would be a lot more silence and dead air. Anyway, off topic and a pet peeve.
When it came out that Trump liked Puccini they immediately tried to tie that with fascism, and what his musical tastes tell us about him. Thank God he didn't mention Wagner and the Ring Cycle. That would be absolute proof he was a Nazi and probably related to Hitler in some way.
I did read about what Maher said. Part of being a politician now is being a showman. It comes with the territory. Some, like Newsom, that's the only thing they are, nice hair. He's basically an empty suit. Ditto Harris and a host of others. Trump is Trump+Showman. He didn't waste all of those years on TV without learning something. People want politicians and actors to be who they think are or want them to be. Raymond Burr use to get letters from people asking legal advice or wanting him to take their case. People who play Dr.'s on TV get letters asking medical advice. John Wayne did not like horses and preferred tailored suits to western attire and liked to shop from catalogs. People want Trump to be Fascist\Nazi and you will never convince them he isn't. It's not just a few people and it's very very weird.
I have zero grace to give my opponents anymore. Period. Someone violently comes at me for expressing my rights they are going down. Sorry, they picked the fight and have spit in my face in the past for expressing my rights that I stood a post for while they slept. Never again without consequence.
The violence Barack and his acolytes have brought...
The good news is that Charlie has converted 10s of millions of young People back from Barack.
I'm not sure how much tolerance or grace I can give. On my dog walk this morning, someone had chalked a memorial, Praye for Charlie Kirk, on the pathway. Years ago there was a BLM one that saved for weeks. This one, which wasn't there before 5 pm yesterday, was already partially erased and defaced. How do we deal with people like this?
Also, you are right about Wiess, particularly in her conservative writers. Some choices are really odd too and don't represent anything but their own con.
I knew that. I just am shocked at times when she picks these 'conversative voices' whp represent the worse of anyone. People who are truly anti-Semitic, racist, and homophobia and switch churches like I do boots.
I learned all I need to know about her when she trash talked Tulsi Gabbard on Joe Rogan’s show. Joe asked her his stock question “What do you mean by that?” and she stammered and squirmed because she knew she had been caught.
So sad, yet so predictable where we find ourselves. The left began this full on assault 100 years ago. Lenin immediately knew that making inroads into America, Europe was all ready in play, was h hugely important. I always find it intellectually hilarous when the left labels the right Nazis, Fascists- of course what the hell is a fascist because a ton of leftist dictators more than qualify for that description. Far right would be monarchy, if you wanted to get technical about it. The far left is national socialist/(Nazis/Mussuolini) and Marxists. Their governments look and act identical. Both have the most important foundational underpining in common and that is socialism.
Both Stalin and Hitler committed genocides, and by all accounts Stalin, before his "heart attack" was sending out memos wanting to start rounding up the Jews and see if he could out do Hitler in that arena as well. The Soviets and the Nazis were allies to start world war II. Everyone seems to forget that the USSR invaded Poland two days after Germany. Political discourse with people who are ignorant of what constitutes these things is simply a waste of oxygen. But because we have going back over 80 years had folks in the academy harping on these falsehoods, simply saying it long enough and loud enough until eveyrone accepts it, we have such a factually ignorant society as it relates to this topic as to be laughable if it weren't so scary now.
When it comes down to it, in the west, it is a question of God or Man, who is greater? Answering that simple question will tell you what you are dealing with, for the most part. Don't get me wrong, Monarchy way back in the day was no picnic either in the west.
I love your framing it like Parler (which by the way spell checks into Parker…). But I’m a bit torn. I think it’s great to let them show us who they are. Perhaps the only response to a “call for violence” isn’t banning a post, but unmasking the identity of anonymous accounts?
Anonymity of social media, where one can hide behind a clever name and an avatar, has allowed too many people to engage in behaviors they likely wouldn't with full disclosure of who they are.
Not to rain on anyones parade (well maybe a little shower) but we've been down this road before. One problem is American politics and people have the attention span of mayflies. Back in the 1970's there were The Days of Rage. There is a book by the same name by Bryan Burrough. Read it. There were 1000's of bombings, planed ambushes and executions or police. Where did all of that go? Down the memory hole. Basically no one was punished. Many of the participants walked, changed their names. Became prominent attorneys, professors, etc. The Black Panthers were hailed as heroes. BLM before BLM. Liberals bailed them out of jail, held fund raisers and parties (Read Tom Wolfe's Radical Chic). Clinton pardoned the FALN terrorists. And on and on and yet another on. Maybe this time it will be different but, let's say, I have some doubts. The old those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it thing. My guess is probably depends on who follows Trump.
Charlie was the perfect target: professing Christian, tall, good-looking white guy with a wife and kids, a successful businessman and a Trump supporter, all the while spending so much time in the public square debating.
Charlie was one in a million. Who would choose to engage with so much hatred, and let's just say it, complete fucking morons, lost in their own bubbles of hate and stupidity? They love the word fascist but killing people you do not agree with is the definition of it.
I hope that the teachers continue to get fired for their hateful comments.
The anti-God crowd is a lustful bunch -- and they got some temporary relief to see Charlie murdered.
God has given them free choice and lets them choose eternal hell away from Him. May they rot in the Hell of their own choosing.
When I see confusion I look at what the Bible says here it is
OVERCOMERS GUIDE SOOO How do we Hate What God Hates, Love As God Loves?
I find people’s responses to Charle
Kirks murder/death is more revealing of their heart than ‘Charles heart. Cheering for the death of someone you disagree with denies them the chance to repent and get right with God.
1. Sooo Is There Room for a Christian to Hate Someone?
The short biblical answer is no—not in the sense of personal hatred. Christians are called to love people, even enemies, while hating sin and evil.
• Matthew 5:43–44
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.”
• Romans 12:19–21
“Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord. Therefore ‘If your enemy is hungry, feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”
• 1 John 4:20
“If someone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?”
👉 God’s standard: Hate evil, but love people. Hatred of people belongs to Satan’s kingdom; love (even in the face of evil) is God’s kingdom.
Sooo what does Gods word call us to be as Jesus sanctified disciple ?
“Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.”
• Not sinless perfection in this life, but wholeness, maturity, integrity, reflecting God’s character.
• James 1:4
“But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing.”
👉 Perfect means mature, complete, whole in character, aligned with God’s will.
Holy (קָדוֹשׁ / qadosh – set apart, pure, sacred)
• Leviticus 11:44
“For I am the Lord your God. You shall therefore consecrate yourselves, and you shall be holy; for I am holy.”
• 1 Peter 1:15–16
“But as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, ‘Be holy, for I am holy.’”
👉 Holy means set apart for God, morally pure, distinct from sin, reflecting God’s nature.
Righteous (צַדִּיק / tsaddiq – just, right, in line with God’s standard)
• Genesis 15:6
“And he believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness.”
• Romans 3:21–22
“But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe.”
👉 Righteous means in right standing with God, aligned with His justice, made right through faith in Christ.
Sooo I must keep removing the logs in my own eyes before I can remove the speck in others eyes
✅ Summary
• Christians are never called to hate people, only sin and evil.
• Perfect = complete, mature, whole in God’s will.
• Holy = set apart, pure, reflecting God’s nature.
• Righteous = right standing with God through faith, living in justice and truth.
This is the the heart of the Christian walk.
When we hate people, it reveals our own lack of compassion and alignment with God. Hatred of people is not God’s way. God hates evil, but His posture toward people is always redemptive — He calls them to repentance rather than abandoning them to hatred.
Here’s the passages of
Six (Seven) Things the Lord Hates Sooo I’ll work on these with the Holy Spirit first.
Proverbs 6:16–19 (NKJV)
“These six things the Lord hates,
Yes, seven are an abomination to Him:
A proud look,
A lying tongue,
Hands that shed innocent blood,
A heart that devises wicked plans,
Feet that are swift in running to evil,
A false witness who speaks lies,
And one who sows discord among brethren.”
🔑 Observations:
• Notice: God hates actions, not the people themselves.
• Pride, lying, murder, wicked scheming, eagerness for evil, false testimony, and divisiveness.
• Yet, the gospel shows us God’s compassion:
• Romans 5:8 — “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
👉 Even when people commit what He hates, His response is love through the cross — offering a way out of condemnation.
Why We Must Not Hate People
• Ephesians 4:31–32
“Let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, and evil speaking be put away from you, with all malice. And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you.”
• Colossians 3:12–13
“Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering; bearing with one another, and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even as Christ forgave you, so you also must do.”
👉 Hatred toward people cancels compassion. God calls us to hate sin but love people — because when we hate, it exposes our own heart more than theirs.
✅ Summary:
• God hates sinful actions (Proverbs 6:16–19).
• God loves people — even those caught in sin.
• Christians are called to mirror God’s heart: hate evil, love people, extend compassion, and forgive.
“Hate What God Hates, Love As God Loves” —
Since hate says more about me than the object of my hate,my work in changing the world starts in me as Chesterton said. The Lord’s Prayer says to forgive us our trespasses/depts as we forgive others. Sooo he who is without sin cast the first stone and pray for those in the media who celebrate murder. Satan who is a lying accuser came to steal,kill and destroy us. Sooo resist in the lord forgive them for they know not what they do and then satan will flee.
All political violence is bad. Lately, it overwhelmingly has come from the left. I don't know why anyone would defend violence at all. If it was the right engaging in violence, I would speak out strongly against it. For example, when pro-life radicals bombed abortion clinics in the 90s, that was horrible.
In the case of Charlie Kirk, the celebrations by many many people on social media was disgusting. They weren't Trump supporters. Thankfully, many of them are losing their jobs.
The Minnesota man was a Walz appointee. There is no hard evidence he was a "Trump supporter". Only media conjecture. He murdered her because she got rid of insurance for illegal aliens. There is no way someone like Walz would appoint a Trump supporter to any position. Not how he operates. No right wingers were crowing on social media about her murder. Not only that, she laid in state at the capitol, and flags were at half mast (which they should have been). https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14812817/Vance-Luther-Boelter-Tim-Walz-Minnesota-suspect-shooting.html It sounds like he was going to participate in the "no kings" parade which would not be a Trump supporter.
The Pelosi attacker, David DePape has no evidence at all of being a Trump supporter. He is nuts.
Couldn't say a thing about the judge and cannot find a lot online about it. But we do know and have video evidence of people going to Supreme Court Justices' homes and threatening them-Kavanaugh with murder after Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer said they "released a whirlwind".
There is a lot of video evidence of people like Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, and others encouraging supporters to go after Republicans. Plenty of video evidence of Democratic legislators calling Republicans Hitler, Nazi, Fascist and any other moniker they could think of to dehumanize them. The dehumizing treatment paves the way for worse things to happen. I think Hillary Clinton referred to us as "deplorables" and worse.
When you read and listen to intellectual leaders of the left like Bill Ayers, rounding up Republicans and putting them into re-education camps is okay.
No one tried to hang Mike Pence. Yes, unhappy with him but no one tried to kill him. Chanted "Hang Mike Pence" which is a lot different than killing someone. He was never in any danger.
However, at a House Republican softball practice a Bernie Sanders supporter did shoot Steve Scalise and almost killed him. If you want to talk about verbal threats to politicians, there a legions of people who have verbally threatened Trump on the streets, on signs, and on social media. Just do a quick search for comedian Kathy Griffin holding a bleeding Trump head.
I don't know what happens next. There are some unstable people on the far right. My hope is that right wing commentators/politicians do not use dehumanizing words to describe the left, and do not use phrases like "we are in a war". Once you cross the war line, you cannot go back.
https://x.com/Ms_Nevva_Eatbug/status/1967322691020718093 It is a lie. The murderer, Vance Boelter, was pissed when Democrat Rep. Hortman broke with her party; siding with REPUBLICANS on a vote about health insurance eligibility. Boelter was ANTI-REPUBLICAN, & FOR illegal aliens' right to access MinnesotaCare.
The left uses many things as a weapon. Words are one of them. That's why you see liberals calling conservatives Nazis. They are seeking to demonise and dehumanize conservatives, making it easier to visit violence upon them. This same technique is used in the military when we are at war. Look a the term krauts, fritz, heinie, jap, nip, dinks, ragheads and so forth. The military uses these terms at to dehumanize the enemy making it easier to justify their killing. I find it ironic that liberals so often use the methods they condemn.
My cousins former ConLaw Professor ar UW Madison posted this 2:48 min clip of Charlie on her blog where hes debating Christian nationalism with another Christian. It is really incredible and well worth your time.
Leftist need to learn that if they dish it out they better be able to take it and you reap what you sow. If you utilize inflammatory rhetoric to incite violence you deserve to get violence in return. Years ago many told me that I should start a podcast because I was able to get along with people on the left and the right due to my background having worked in both parties, but over the past half decade or so I have lost nearly all my patience and tolerance for the crack pots whose hatred for one man's personality and conservatives in general has them rationalizing and justifying inappropriate speech and conduct. Their failure to recognize that no matter how deep their feelings may be about something, they are not justified in violence, has led to an incitement of violence and that is irrefutable. Therefore I've made it clear and put in writing on my social media accounts that if you ever refer to me as a fascist or a Nazi that I will consider it an act of self-defense to beat the living crap out of you. It is about survival now. If you think that's a bit of an extreme viewpoint, you are rapidly becoming part of a minority who is refusing to face reality. All you have to do is look at some of the insane rantings and ravings and ramblings of emotionally unhinged liberals over the past few months and you'll see my words have merit.
Jeff, words and civil discourse have not worked ever since the Obama era, because the old adage: "You cannot reason with an unreasonable person" has never been more evident.
Just like the only effective deterrent to terrorism is overwhelming Force, so too the only effective deterrent to inflammatory rhetoric leading to incitement of violence is to punish the offender in such a painful way that they never try that crap again. They're entitled to think and feel whatever the hell they want, but they cannot speak and act without consequence and thus far, the consequences have not been effective enough. I have been responsible for, either individually or as a part of a group, more than 30 people losing their jobs since October 7th of 2023 and I will continue to bust my ass to make sure that continues.
Likewise, conservatives need to see to it that liberal journalists, politicians, teachers and social media trolls are held accountable for unacceptable behavior, including speech, in ways that are painful. Yes you have free speech without legal recourse (unless of course, you are advocating nondefensive violence) but there's a difference between legal recriminations and professional and personal ones and where we need to get better as conservatives is in dishing out personal and professional consequences to these tin foil hat wearing, violence advocating lunatics.
AMEN!
Let me suggest that we encourage investigation and prosecutions of the groups funding the Left--Soros, Antifa, etc.
I do have idea which I think might help with the rogue district judge injections. Trying to find the correct person to help me propose this to someone with enough of a platform or power to advance it. Let me know here if you are interested/could help. We'd need fearless trial lawyers
I have been informed that there are currently multiple ongoing investigations into rogue District judges as well as multiple leftist extremist groups and ironically, the President I believe today stated the same thing regarding the leftist groups.
Both Open Society and Code ptink are part of ongoing investigations. This week more will be added, if they have not been already.
The leftist extremist groups are more immediate concern at the moment and therefore, receiving the majority of the labor intensive investigation efforts.
I did request, and was met with a positive reception, an investigation into Judge Boasberg's conflicts of him ruling on policy matters that would impact his wife's and his daughter's affiliations with liberal NGO groups, in particular, illegal immigration
This is good news and obviously, the focus on leftist terrorist groups makes sense.
My idea is to assemble plaintiffs for a class action suit against the rogue district judges. Be sure to assemble plaintiffs from each of the districts with obstructing judges--whose "restraining orders" are unconstitutionally applied across the entire country (district judges don't have the power to act nationally).
Your idea of a class action suit sounds great and it's just a question of getting the right Law firm to take it on.
Hope someone here knows of a good firm.
-->"I don’t appreciate a lot of Trump’s language toward the opposite side either. It’s not helpful. It’s one of the things I dislike about Trump and will not defend him on"
I'm seriously curious as to what you would recommend be Trump's messaging style? He's confronted with a hostile and opposition media, and Democrat opponents who bewail him with epithets. The go-along to get-along approach used by Republicans in the past resulted in getting steam-rolled by media and Democrats. He seems to have learned from his first term, and is intent to set his agenda, letting others respond to it--rather than responding to the agenda others' set.
I don't think calling Jerome Powell an idiot was very constructive. Instead he could have pointed out the negative affects of high interest rates. Insulting Powell is not a good look. Now if we're talking about the fake news media and the Adam Schiffs of the world I fully support his style.
I also don't think calling political competitors "vermin" is a good one either.
Or making up shoolyard names for them, like he did for DeSantis. But it goes deeper than that. He is a study in contradictions - f.i., he is not a principled capitalist.
Schoolyard names are fine.....juvenile, but fine
In some cases that's an insult to vermin everywhere.🤣👏💯
The left tried to kill him, imprison him, bankrupt him, and silence him. President Trump has shown incredible restraint in how he has responded to the war against him and his family. President Trump cannot respond like a President Reagan would have, as President Reagan’s America is dead. Our culture has become much more coarse since the 1980s, so I have zero issue with how President Trump speaks.
But I do have a huge problem on how the Republicans in Congress speak. They need to up their game against the leftists who want us all dead. They are currently failing in how they are responding to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
There is lots of talk about Civil War 2.0. Seems far fetched, but you will get Civil War 2.0 from the people if the government does not assert its legal power against the violent leftist death cults. They need to be crushed through legal justice. Unconditional surrender is how America wins wars.
The choice right now is between civilization vs. chaos, and the speech needs to match the existential struggle we are in.
The persecution of Trump is beyond belief and it started in the Obama White House at the Resolute desk. I agree more with you than you do with yourself.
JLM
The continued persecution of President Trump was pre-ordained when Obama chose to keep a Washington residence after his term was over. Obama unleashed the evil we are living with, so we must act accordingly. As they say, “when you meet the devil, he won’t have horns and a tail”.
Obama’s legacy must be reduced to dust and scattered to the four winds. Let’s start with all the NGOs he used. Salt every single field Obama stepped on. We can’t exile him, but we can treat him as if he’s been exiled.
Thanks for your thoughtful reply--with which I agree. It's not the '80s and Congressional Republicans rely far too much on their historic go-along to get-along approach. Queensberry Rules Republicans get rolled every time--never learning from experience. The political world is dominated by the tenor inflicted by Democrats and Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals." Every Republican should learn them and abide them. And to anticipate a criticism, learning those simple rules is realism--not becoming what your enemy is. Play the game as it presents itself, or retreat to the sidelines and live with the outcome. It's up to you.
You can be forceful without the cheap shot name calling. It's like cursing. It demeans the conversation. Saying the F word or "shite" a lot doesn't make you tough or look tough. It makes you look like a poser. I was an engineer in a pervious life and I know all the words and can string them together pretty well. But it doesn't really accomplish anything. Churchill was a forceful communicator. Maybe he cursed a lot in private but not in his speeches. It distracts from the point. People concentrate on the name calling and not the point you are trying to make. Counter productive.
Yes, BUT...and its a big but.
Trump uses controversial and even insulting speech to get the legacy/MSM to cover an issue. Otherwise these outlets--really just leftist appendages--either don't include the story or smother it.
Obama and his ilk were schooled in the toxic and far left ideologies of former Weatherman Bill Ayres. (remember they too bombed and killed people. And his compadre, Bernadine Dorn, is, iirc a professor!). Their project to control all the institutions of our society has been largely successful in hoodwinking and propagandizing a large (plurality? majority?) portion of Western society including in the USA.
God knows their hearts. But remember that while Jesus asked us to be gentle as doves He also admonished us to be wise as serpents. I can see the evil of the Left and their "leaders". So if Trump talks brashly or "offensively"...I remember not just what he is confronting, but the dire necessity of saving our country.
True but they wind up covering the way he said it and not the what he said.. It gives them an opportunity to avoid the main topic(s) by concentrating on the language he uses. I think the term Stray Voltage arose (in the political context) during Obama's time in office. When Trump does his shtick, the media concentrate on the stray voltage and his point gets lost in the noise. Calling Powell someone "vermin" doesn't really accomplish much. Calling them incompetent or inept, or not up to the job gets the same message across. The message should be the message. The story should be about the message. Not about the word choice or phrasing of the message.
I hear you...
That's a fair critique. I think 'counter-productive' would be our host's description as well.
Trump is his own man, so I won't offer a defense of his approach. As a rule, I don't have much time to devote to listening to politicians, rather than that which they accomplish, or forward as their policies. Cheers.
All politicians are by their nature actors (All the world's a stage so to speak) Their public persona often differs from their private persona. See JFK, FDR, etc. I believe in the past they were more true to themselves. Teddy Roosevelt the politician was probably closer to Teddy Roosevelt the person than FDR was. Sometimes the gap is large (JFK) sometimes smaller. Trump does his thing because it works, the majority of his base likes it, he doesn't overplay it, and he has the accomplishments to back it up. Referring to your comment about accomplishments and moving forward his policies.
I think it's closer to who he really is then let's say Biden or just about any D now. In the first Avenger movie Captain America says to Iron Man: We need a plan of attack. Iron Man replies I have a plan. CA asks him what it is. He replies "Attack". Every time I hear that I think of Trump. Trump is very different from his R predecessors and in particular both Bush's. Maybe that's exactly what the party needs now. Maybe that's exactly what this country needs. At any rate I doubt he is going to change. Cheers and Good wishes.
In case you hadn't seen it, here's Bill Maher after he had dinner with Trump in April. BTW, I don't watch Maher but know his tendencies via years of seeing clips from his HBO show. You could say Maher was forthright and honest--and yet it apparently had no effect on the woke/prog/left in this country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BTxUDbkJUI
It's YouTube, so you have to suffer an opening commercial which you can skip. 11-12 min. Best.
I read about it. My hearing is so bad that unless it's CC I don't watch anything. X needs CC! I didn't watch this even though YouTube does have CC's, because I don't care for Maher. Nothing political, I just don't think he's funny or even mildly amusing. His timing is all wrong. It's TV timing and by that I mean waiting for the Applause sign to flash so the audience will start clapping and\or laughing. Tell a joke, wait, look around.... I suspect if they got rid of the Applause sign there would be a lot more silence and dead air. Anyway, off topic and a pet peeve.
When it came out that Trump liked Puccini they immediately tried to tie that with fascism, and what his musical tastes tell us about him. Thank God he didn't mention Wagner and the Ring Cycle. That would be absolute proof he was a Nazi and probably related to Hitler in some way.
I did read about what Maher said. Part of being a politician now is being a showman. It comes with the territory. Some, like Newsom, that's the only thing they are, nice hair. He's basically an empty suit. Ditto Harris and a host of others. Trump is Trump+Showman. He didn't waste all of those years on TV without learning something. People want politicians and actors to be who they think are or want them to be. Raymond Burr use to get letters from people asking legal advice or wanting him to take their case. People who play Dr.'s on TV get letters asking medical advice. John Wayne did not like horses and preferred tailored suits to western attire and liked to shop from catalogs. People want Trump to be Fascist\Nazi and you will never convince them he isn't. It's not just a few people and it's very very weird.
A Chicago Democrat like Barack Obama wood nevir doo nuthin’ bayd. Eveething on da up ‘n up, an’ whatnaht.
Punch 10.
I have zero grace to give my opponents anymore. Period. Someone violently comes at me for expressing my rights they are going down. Sorry, they picked the fight and have spit in my face in the past for expressing my rights that I stood a post for while they slept. Never again without consequence.
The violence Barack and his acolytes have brought...
The good news is that Charlie has converted 10s of millions of young People back from Barack.
Well said.
I'm not sure how much tolerance or grace I can give. On my dog walk this morning, someone had chalked a memorial, Praye for Charlie Kirk, on the pathway. Years ago there was a BLM one that saved for weeks. This one, which wasn't there before 5 pm yesterday, was already partially erased and defaced. How do we deal with people like this?
Also, you are right about Wiess, particularly in her conservative writers. Some choices are really odd too and don't represent anything but their own con.
Weiss is a non-woke liberal, not a conservative. She is not the answer to anything this country needs. A non-strident liberal is still a liberal.
There are zero positive outcomes for any liberal policies. None. They all end in failure because they’re rooted in emotion and not truth.
I knew that. I just am shocked at times when she picks these 'conversative voices' whp represent the worse of anyone. People who are truly anti-Semitic, racist, and homophobia and switch churches like I do boots.
I learned all I need to know about her when she trash talked Tulsi Gabbard on Joe Rogan’s show. Joe asked her his stock question “What do you mean by that?” and she stammered and squirmed because she knew she had been caught.
I don’t fall for her liberal game.
So sad, yet so predictable where we find ourselves. The left began this full on assault 100 years ago. Lenin immediately knew that making inroads into America, Europe was all ready in play, was h hugely important. I always find it intellectually hilarous when the left labels the right Nazis, Fascists- of course what the hell is a fascist because a ton of leftist dictators more than qualify for that description. Far right would be monarchy, if you wanted to get technical about it. The far left is national socialist/(Nazis/Mussuolini) and Marxists. Their governments look and act identical. Both have the most important foundational underpining in common and that is socialism.
Both Stalin and Hitler committed genocides, and by all accounts Stalin, before his "heart attack" was sending out memos wanting to start rounding up the Jews and see if he could out do Hitler in that arena as well. The Soviets and the Nazis were allies to start world war II. Everyone seems to forget that the USSR invaded Poland two days after Germany. Political discourse with people who are ignorant of what constitutes these things is simply a waste of oxygen. But because we have going back over 80 years had folks in the academy harping on these falsehoods, simply saying it long enough and loud enough until eveyrone accepts it, we have such a factually ignorant society as it relates to this topic as to be laughable if it weren't so scary now.
When it comes down to it, in the west, it is a question of God or Man, who is greater? Answering that simple question will tell you what you are dealing with, for the most part. Don't get me wrong, Monarchy way back in the day was no picnic either in the west.
I love your framing it like Parler (which by the way spell checks into Parker…). But I’m a bit torn. I think it’s great to let them show us who they are. Perhaps the only response to a “call for violence” isn’t banning a post, but unmasking the identity of anonymous accounts?
Anonymity of social media, where one can hide behind a clever name and an avatar, has allowed too many people to engage in behaviors they likely wouldn't with full disclosure of who they are.
If you look at the storm on LinkedIn, you'll see open hostility from people under their own names whose professional profile is 1 click away.
Not to rain on anyones parade (well maybe a little shower) but we've been down this road before. One problem is American politics and people have the attention span of mayflies. Back in the 1970's there were The Days of Rage. There is a book by the same name by Bryan Burrough. Read it. There were 1000's of bombings, planed ambushes and executions or police. Where did all of that go? Down the memory hole. Basically no one was punished. Many of the participants walked, changed their names. Became prominent attorneys, professors, etc. The Black Panthers were hailed as heroes. BLM before BLM. Liberals bailed them out of jail, held fund raisers and parties (Read Tom Wolfe's Radical Chic). Clinton pardoned the FALN terrorists. And on and on and yet another on. Maybe this time it will be different but, let's say, I have some doubts. The old those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it thing. My guess is probably depends on who follows Trump.
This is the real Obama, and this is where the current Democrat violence started. His hands are dripping blood.
June 14, 2008: “If they bring a knife, we bring a gun…”
September 18, 2008: “Argue with neighbors, get in their face”
Obama has never faced what President Trump has had to endure, yet it’s President Trump that is constantly called out for his speech. Enough already.
Charlie was the perfect target: professing Christian, tall, good-looking white guy with a wife and kids, a successful businessman and a Trump supporter, all the while spending so much time in the public square debating.
Charlie was one in a million. Who would choose to engage with so much hatred, and let's just say it, complete fucking morons, lost in their own bubbles of hate and stupidity? They love the word fascist but killing people you do not agree with is the definition of it.
I hope that the teachers continue to get fired for their hateful comments.
The anti-God crowd is a lustful bunch -- and they got some temporary relief to see Charlie murdered.
God has given them free choice and lets them choose eternal hell away from Him. May they rot in the Hell of their own choosing.
When I see confusion I look at what the Bible says here it is
OVERCOMERS GUIDE SOOO How do we Hate What God Hates, Love As God Loves?
I find people’s responses to Charle
Kirks murder/death is more revealing of their heart than ‘Charles heart. Cheering for the death of someone you disagree with denies them the chance to repent and get right with God.
1. Sooo Is There Room for a Christian to Hate Someone?
The short biblical answer is no—not in the sense of personal hatred. Christians are called to love people, even enemies, while hating sin and evil.
• Matthew 5:43–44
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.”
• Romans 12:19–21
“Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath; for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord. Therefore ‘If your enemy is hungry, feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head.’ Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”
• 1 John 4:20
“If someone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen?”
👉 God’s standard: Hate evil, but love people. Hatred of people belongs to Satan’s kingdom; love (even in the face of evil) is God’s kingdom.
Sooo what does Gods word call us to be as Jesus sanctified disciple ?
2. Definitions with NKJV Verses
Perfect (τέλειος / teleios – complete, mature, finished)
• Matthew 5:48
“Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.”
• Not sinless perfection in this life, but wholeness, maturity, integrity, reflecting God’s character.
• James 1:4
“But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing.”
👉 Perfect means mature, complete, whole in character, aligned with God’s will.
Holy (קָדוֹשׁ / qadosh – set apart, pure, sacred)
• Leviticus 11:44
“For I am the Lord your God. You shall therefore consecrate yourselves, and you shall be holy; for I am holy.”
• 1 Peter 1:15–16
“But as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, ‘Be holy, for I am holy.’”
👉 Holy means set apart for God, morally pure, distinct from sin, reflecting God’s nature.
Righteous (צַדִּיק / tsaddiq – just, right, in line with God’s standard)
• Genesis 15:6
“And he believed in the Lord, and He accounted it to him for righteousness.”
• Romans 3:21–22
“But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe.”
👉 Righteous means in right standing with God, aligned with His justice, made right through faith in Christ.
Sooo I must keep removing the logs in my own eyes before I can remove the speck in others eyes
✅ Summary
• Christians are never called to hate people, only sin and evil.
• Perfect = complete, mature, whole in God’s will.
• Holy = set apart, pure, reflecting God’s nature.
• Righteous = right standing with God through faith, living in justice and truth.
This is the the heart of the Christian walk.
When we hate people, it reveals our own lack of compassion and alignment with God. Hatred of people is not God’s way. God hates evil, but His posture toward people is always redemptive — He calls them to repentance rather than abandoning them to hatred.
Here’s the passages of
Six (Seven) Things the Lord Hates Sooo I’ll work on these with the Holy Spirit first.
Proverbs 6:16–19 (NKJV)
“These six things the Lord hates,
Yes, seven are an abomination to Him:
A proud look,
A lying tongue,
Hands that shed innocent blood,
A heart that devises wicked plans,
Feet that are swift in running to evil,
A false witness who speaks lies,
And one who sows discord among brethren.”
🔑 Observations:
• Notice: God hates actions, not the people themselves.
• Pride, lying, murder, wicked scheming, eagerness for evil, false testimony, and divisiveness.
• Yet, the gospel shows us God’s compassion:
• Romans 5:8 — “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
👉 Even when people commit what He hates, His response is love through the cross — offering a way out of condemnation.
Why We Must Not Hate People
• Ephesians 4:31–32
“Let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, and evil speaking be put away from you, with all malice. And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you.”
• Colossians 3:12–13
“Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies, kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering; bearing with one another, and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even as Christ forgave you, so you also must do.”
👉 Hatred toward people cancels compassion. God calls us to hate sin but love people — because when we hate, it exposes our own heart more than theirs.
✅ Summary:
• God hates sinful actions (Proverbs 6:16–19).
• God loves people — even those caught in sin.
• Christians are called to mirror God’s heart: hate evil, love people, extend compassion, and forgive.
“Hate What God Hates, Love As God Loves” —
Since hate says more about me than the object of my hate,my work in changing the world starts in me as Chesterton said. The Lord’s Prayer says to forgive us our trespasses/depts as we forgive others. Sooo he who is without sin cast the first stone and pray for those in the media who celebrate murder. Satan who is a lying accuser came to steal,kill and destroy us. Sooo resist in the lord forgive them for they know not what they do and then satan will flee.
Blessings brother bill/dad
Our Daily Bread MinistriesSUPPORT
Jeff, you’ve conveniently left out this list.
The man who targeted and killed Democratic state
Rep Melissa Hortman and her husband was a Trump supporter.
The man who targeted the home of Dem Governor
Josh Shapiro was a Trump supporter.
The men who wanted to hang Mike Pence on Jan 6th
were Trump supporters.
The man who targeted and killed the son of Obama-appointed District Judge Esther Salas was a Trump supporter.
The man who tried to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and assaulted her husband was a Trump supporter.
The men who were convicted trying to kidnap Dem Governor Gretchen Whitmer were Trump supporters.
The man who sent pipe bombs to the homes of Obama and Biden was a Trump supporter.
There is no equivalent or even similar list of Obama or
Biden supporters who have carried out similar murders, attempted murders, or violent attacks.
All political violence is bad. Lately, it overwhelmingly has come from the left. I don't know why anyone would defend violence at all. If it was the right engaging in violence, I would speak out strongly against it. For example, when pro-life radicals bombed abortion clinics in the 90s, that was horrible.
In the case of Charlie Kirk, the celebrations by many many people on social media was disgusting. They weren't Trump supporters. Thankfully, many of them are losing their jobs.
The Minnesota man was a Walz appointee. There is no hard evidence he was a "Trump supporter". Only media conjecture. He murdered her because she got rid of insurance for illegal aliens. There is no way someone like Walz would appoint a Trump supporter to any position. Not how he operates. No right wingers were crowing on social media about her murder. Not only that, she laid in state at the capitol, and flags were at half mast (which they should have been). https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14812817/Vance-Luther-Boelter-Tim-Walz-Minnesota-suspect-shooting.html It sounds like he was going to participate in the "no kings" parade which would not be a Trump supporter.
Here are links debunking many of your assertions.
The man who targeted Shapiro was not a Trump supporter. https://abcnews.go.com/US/cody-allen-balmer-suspect-accused-arson-attack-gov/story?id=120811181
Gretchen Whitmer's thing was an FBI plot https://deepstate.news/2020-10-16-gretchen-whitmer-kidnapping-plot-false-flag-operation-hatched-by-fbi.html not Trump supporters.
The Pelosi attacker, David DePape has no evidence at all of being a Trump supporter. He is nuts.
Couldn't say a thing about the judge and cannot find a lot online about it. But we do know and have video evidence of people going to Supreme Court Justices' homes and threatening them-Kavanaugh with murder after Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer said they "released a whirlwind".
There is a lot of video evidence of people like Maxine Waters, Ilhan Omar, and others encouraging supporters to go after Republicans. Plenty of video evidence of Democratic legislators calling Republicans Hitler, Nazi, Fascist and any other moniker they could think of to dehumanize them. The dehumizing treatment paves the way for worse things to happen. I think Hillary Clinton referred to us as "deplorables" and worse.
When you read and listen to intellectual leaders of the left like Bill Ayers, rounding up Republicans and putting them into re-education camps is okay.
No one tried to hang Mike Pence. Yes, unhappy with him but no one tried to kill him. Chanted "Hang Mike Pence" which is a lot different than killing someone. He was never in any danger.
However, at a House Republican softball practice a Bernie Sanders supporter did shoot Steve Scalise and almost killed him. If you want to talk about verbal threats to politicians, there a legions of people who have verbally threatened Trump on the streets, on signs, and on social media. Just do a quick search for comedian Kathy Griffin holding a bleeding Trump head.
Sayoc was a "Super MAGA" and thankfully, none of the bombs exploded https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/05/cesar-sayoc-sentenced-to-20-years-for-sending-bombs-to-trump-critics.html.
I don't know what happens next. There are some unstable people on the far right. My hope is that right wing commentators/politicians do not use dehumanizing words to describe the left, and do not use phrases like "we are in a war". Once you cross the war line, you cannot go back.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states
Schizo, no political affiliation. Hated Israel. He was not a Republican
https://x.com/Ms_Nevva_Eatbug/status/1967322691020718093 It is a lie. The murderer, Vance Boelter, was pissed when Democrat Rep. Hortman broke with her party; siding with REPUBLICANS on a vote about health insurance eligibility. Boelter was ANTI-REPUBLICAN, & FOR illegal aliens' right to access MinnesotaCare.
Boelter had a hit list of elected officials… all of which were Democrats.
The left uses many things as a weapon. Words are one of them. That's why you see liberals calling conservatives Nazis. They are seeking to demonise and dehumanize conservatives, making it easier to visit violence upon them. This same technique is used in the military when we are at war. Look a the term krauts, fritz, heinie, jap, nip, dinks, ragheads and so forth. The military uses these terms at to dehumanize the enemy making it easier to justify their killing. I find it ironic that liberals so often use the methods they condemn.
My cousins former ConLaw Professor ar UW Madison posted this 2:48 min clip of Charlie on her blog where hes debating Christian nationalism with another Christian. It is really incredible and well worth your time.
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2025/09/i-think-what-enemy-intended-for-evil.html?m=1
Thanks for anything you were able to do in getting Mark Sivek removed.