Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donald Wolfe's avatar

Used to be there was a "cost" to money. Savers demanded a return from borrowers. Now it seems money should be free or nearly free. The people pushing for "free" money are those who want to cut borrowing costs. Market "longs" who love free money for their margin accounts and other market shenanigans and big debtors. Oh, by the way, who is the biggest debtor again? There was a "market tantrum" once and they bullied the fed. They are trying to run the same game again, bully the fed into lowering rates.

Personally, I don't think 4% to 5% for long term (10 yr.) money as historically expensive. I think if one was (were?) to look back over a longer term than the last 10 or 15 years, it would be borne out. I don't see any reason to cut rates.

Monetary policy is only half of one side of the equation. The other half is fiscal policy. Congress, led by the W.H. want to spend like drunken sailors and try and get the fed to clean the mess up with monetary policy - asinine, moronic, cheap pettifoggery.

Besides, if there are no cuts early, there will be no cuts later as it is an election year and unless the fed wants to look like a complete tool (both definitions) of the admin. they will not cut later.

My two cents.

Expand full comment
John Oh's avatar

Does anyone really believe government reports? This is more and more like trying to reading between the lines of Pravda or Izvestia to figure out what's going on during the good old days.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts