Cellphone location data, as I understand it, derives from GPS data if the phone has GPS enabled, otherwise, based on triangulation of distances from multiple cell towers. The first should usually be accurate to around 20-30 feet, for the second, more like 500-1000 feet.
I don't know whether the purchased data includes a 'how derived' flag, indicating what records are GPS-derived versus which are not. Would seem important to know.
I haven't done the statistical analysis (and neither, I suspect, have the various professors who claim in 'fact checks' that you can't draw any conclusions from the cellphone data), but adjacency to TEN drop boxes as well as FIVE political nonprofits seems like a pretty tight screen for GPS-derived locations.
D'Souza is about 1/4 of a step saner than Sidney Powell. There is no need to listen to a thing the guy says, even if he sometimes says things that are close to reasonable. There's been no election with more investigations than 2020's. None of the official ones have come up with anything substantive. And even most of the crackpot ones ("Cyber Ninja"!) haven't found anything material. There's just no such thing as a competent, secret conspiracy theory of such scope necessary to change multiple states' counts.
It's fine to believe some laws should be tightened up to address the points in your list. My personal preference is to have an Election Day holiday. There are better sources of information and advocates of change than relying on fringe actors.
Why wouldn't you want to have a beer with Dinesh? I listen to his daily podcast and find him engaging, quite intelligent and extremely well read. Just the type of person I would love to chat with.
Cellphone location data, as I understand it, derives from GPS data if the phone has GPS enabled, otherwise, based on triangulation of distances from multiple cell towers. The first should usually be accurate to around 20-30 feet, for the second, more like 500-1000 feet.
I don't know whether the purchased data includes a 'how derived' flag, indicating what records are GPS-derived versus which are not. Would seem important to know.
I haven't done the statistical analysis (and neither, I suspect, have the various professors who claim in 'fact checks' that you can't draw any conclusions from the cellphone data), but adjacency to TEN drop boxes as well as FIVE political nonprofits seems like a pretty tight screen for GPS-derived locations.
Yuma County (AZ) sheriffs office beginning an investigation:
https://www.truethevote.org/yuma-county-sheriffs-office-opens-massive-voter-fraud-investigation/
See the twitter commentary following this Washington Post 'fact checking' article...not a whole lot of open-minded, analytical people represented:
https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1524590704026136577
D'Souza is about 1/4 of a step saner than Sidney Powell. There is no need to listen to a thing the guy says, even if he sometimes says things that are close to reasonable. There's been no election with more investigations than 2020's. None of the official ones have come up with anything substantive. And even most of the crackpot ones ("Cyber Ninja"!) haven't found anything material. There's just no such thing as a competent, secret conspiracy theory of such scope necessary to change multiple states' counts.
It's fine to believe some laws should be tightened up to address the points in your list. My personal preference is to have an Election Day holiday. There are better sources of information and advocates of change than relying on fringe actors.
Why wouldn't you want to have a beer with Dinesh? I listen to his daily podcast and find him engaging, quite intelligent and extremely well read. Just the type of person I would love to chat with.
You?