32 Comments
author

If you don't protect Supreme Court justices private homes from violent protestors, you might be living in a pre-Marxist society

Expand full comment

If you don't protect Supreme Court Justices' private homes, politicians' private homes, professors'(Cal Berkeley Law School Dean)private homes and Business Leaders' private homes (many of whom can afford private security that won't take crap from anybody), you are not just living in a Marxist society, you are accepting lawlessness which is permitted in third world Nations and when you tolerate that behavior, you become that. As a nefarious character, a former coworker on the floor, once told me when I asked him about a local political dispute boiling over into more than just verbal debate:"I don't have time to wait for the police, so I take matters into my own hands. When they read about the consequences in the newspaper the next day it will never happen again."😱😄

Paraphrased in the interest of removing the profanity hahaha

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

1. Scott McKay of the American Spectator argues that this decay is deliberate. He calls it "weaponized government failure." In a nutshell: the kleptocrats in city governments realize that the middle class is the biggest political threat to them. So make the city unlivable for them, drive them out, and leave behind a class of those dependent on the kleptocrats, and which is likely to be atomized, uneducated, and unmotivated to challenge. This entrenches the kleptocrats for life. Better to rule over a wasteland where they can still skim money than actually have to perform productive work outside politics.

2. St. Louis' decline began in the 1960s. It was on a somewhat shallower trajectory than Detroit's, but downtown was dying by the 1990s when I moved there (while teaching at Wash U Olin) and it was clear it was never coming back.

Expand full comment
author

It took the fake Ferguson Hands up Don't shoot narrative to really bring it to its knees. George Ferguson was the SAME, at scale.

Expand full comment
Apr 10·edited Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

As you probably already know, this deliberate decay is the Curley Effect.

Sad to say, but American states and cities are so fabulously wealthy and there is such a huge pool of money for these crooks to divvy up that the wasteland these politicians desire to rule over will still allow them to live luxuriously, and certainly beyond what their expected station in life would be if they had to depend only on their intellect and compete in a meritocracy. These politicians make the Mob look like amateurs.

Willie Sutton: “I rob banks because that’s where the money is”

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

We have an example of a country doing the same thing in South Africa. They have almost driven the whites out for good and the country is a wasteland with infrastructure breaking down

Expand full comment
author

How'd that work for Rhodesia?

Expand full comment

I believe it's intentional too. We saw Detroit commit suicide as we grew up in the Midwest, and now that paradigm is being applied everywhere.

Do you have a link to the article btw?

Expand full comment
author

Linked in the piece at the top I think

Expand full comment
Apr 10·edited Apr 10

McKay's argument is almost a perfect example of "motive-attribution asymmetry." I disagree wholeheartedly with the vast majority of Brandon Johnson's programs. One thing I don't believe is that he wants the city to fail. Believing one's own views are smart and the other's are evil is just the cheapest way out. There are lots of real problems including cronyism. And one ultimate result could well be a government of city employees, by city employees, for city employees. But that's completely separate from the guy's goals. Wanting to rule a wasteland does not pass a smell test. One small, hopeful example: Johnson wants to speed up property development. Will it succeed? Can't tell yet. And nobody should forget the person most responsible for putting Chicago on its current negative path was Richard M. Daley.

Expand full comment

Way before that, Jane Byrne really began the decline with the atrocious slap in the face to the intelligence of every resident of the city of Chicago by pretending to move into Cabrini Green for a few days. The slime and corruption of that administration was legendary even in Chicago.

Expand full comment

Decline is a choice. It’s the ethos of our time. America’s “Fundamental Transformation” continues apace. Thanks Obama! Meanwhile, the US Federal government is a gangster organization which thrives o propaganda, threats, bribery, and money laundering. Go figure. But all is not lost. Look at how Giuliani was able to revive NYC. Collectively, people need to decide. Do they want to work toward a brighter future, or do they want to be parasites sucking from a dying body. The existence of this nation depends on a critical mass of citizens’ answer to that question.

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

Jeff, it appears that the blue cities are going to have to go a lot further toward anarchy and bankruptcy (whichever comes first) before the voters there are willing to accept what is necessary to rectify their situation. And while I agree with you that face to face collaboration is far superior to virtual interaction, I don't believe the density of cities is required to achieve that. We as a larger society appear to be willing to let cities go and work / route around them. The future is not urban.

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

And still, mayors like London Breed of the ruined SF, still talk about "re-imagining and revitalizing" their cities--which of course is just extracting billions from the feds for more boondoggle projects. Never a word about the squalor and crime that destroyed the city in the first place.

I'm sure you have all heard of the Curley Effect, but as you say, its point is that they would rather rule over ashes, if that's what it takes. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8942

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

Great post Mr Carter! We're on the "road to serfdom". Nothing changes until the cities go bankrupt and the voters wake up! The overall effect this has on the country is what worries me!

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

The problem is the voters will never wake up they keep voting for all the fools and expect the different results.

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

Yes, and turnout goes consistently down!

Expand full comment
author

Oh yes! I know Democrats that would never think of voting for the other party. The core issue is abortion. Then they will mention corporatism-even though the corporations are sitting in the Democratic Party now

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

I went to a reit convention at the Fairmont yesterday

I was rerouted by police twice

Because there was gunfire

WTF

This is like Iraq

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

Have a friend that had a restaurant in downtown St Louis in the Metropolitan building beautiful view of the arch and river voted one of the top itialin restaurants in St. Louis had to close and move in 2018 no one was going downtown back then.

Expand full comment
Apr 10Liked by Jeffrey Carter

X's @ericgarland has been tracking Mizzou corruption for years, particularly St. Louis' corruption, which includes East St. Louis, IL. Your fellow Manny's diner from election day is from that area, as you might recall. St. Louis corruption is of a far starker level than our good old fashioned Chicago Machine level corruption, as Mr. Garland has now instructed me. (He's totally off on a NeverTrump bender right now, but his earlier St. Louis stuff is gold.).

Expand full comment
author
Apr 10·edited Apr 10Author

Durbin is. Madison County Illinois is a cesspool of trial lawyers and progressivism. Never met a person from there I could get along with very well. Most are toxic individuals.

Expand full comment

I did business with a very well connected Democrat in the late seventies down at SIU who introduced me to Jimmy Carter on the tarmac when he was running for President. I liked Paul Simon and thought he was a genuinely good guy, though didn't get to know him well, but got to meet him a few times and think he was one of the last liberals that at least in theory (which doesn't always translate to reality and is one of the worst flaws of Democrats thinking the opposite) had a semi-realistic if utopian view that he could do something for the greater good. Politics in Southern Illinois and Northeast Missouri made City of Chicago seem like rank amateurs and I've never forgotten that, because I didn't think they could happen anywhere in the country other than Louisiana and Mississippi.

It was just obnoxious.

Expand full comment

Home of the "Palms Up!" Tribe.

Expand full comment

Homelessness is a big part of what is destroying our cities.

The major issue in homelessness is not the lack of housing. It's the refusal of society to say no. No, you can't camp in this city. No, you can't shit in the streets. No, you can't panhandle aggressively. No, you can't shoot up publicly and leave your used needles lying around. The fact that we are not going to allow you to destroy our city by doing these things is not our problem. It's your problem. You can solve your problem by not doing drugs, getting help for your mental problems, getting a job, and sharing rent with others so inclined until you can afford a place of your own, probably in a lower cost community. This is not going to happen because the people we have elected allow the homeless to wallow in their victimhood rather than accept personal responsibility for their self destructiveness.

Expand full comment

True Dat!

Expand full comment

Great article, thank you.

As our nation begins to hopefully experience a "return to center theory" being played out in reality, whereby the majority veer slightly left or slightly right and then return to center every decade or so, hopefully we'll see some of these issues addressed, because people in positions of authority are finally being brought back to center and brought back to reality. The issue is in the past few decades that the numbers of extremists has probably grown from tenths of a percent to about 5% on each side and that's scary, because extremists on either side are very dangerous.

You know it's gotten really bad when private schools in big cities are starting to act more progressive in some cases than the public schools and you're very familiar of course with Parker and they are a perfect example of that. The past decade has shown a sad decline in their willingness to practice principles instead of kowtowing to progressive policy.

Last but not least, we simply need a better accounting in terms of checks and balances in expenditures in big city budgets and that's been a problem for years and the company that can figure out a way to utilize artificial intelligence to point out corruption is going to do very well, but I think it's 50/50 that it will happen.

Expand full comment

A couple points and a couple articles.

• Brandon Johnson is actually trying to speed up the property development process. Hopefully the initiative will succeed. The NIMBY coalition is a weird one, though. It includes some of Johnson's normal allies and a lot of upper middle class north siders.

• IMO letting Amazon take over retail will be viewed as a really dumb mistake. Much like letting newspapers die. Or letting streaming take over music. Shopping centers were great. Amazon's 'enshittification' is real.

• Not just STL that's looking to attract visitors. If WFH is going to die then hopefully the death is swift.

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/opinion/chicagos-loop-can-be-revitalized-opinion

• A great article from Arthur Brooks on trust and civic virtue:

https://muse.jhu.edu/article/922831

Expand full comment

Also about St Louis u can drive 10 minutes tho the hill and find homes for over a million dollars.

Expand full comment
author

not for long

Expand full comment

Ferguson being one of the early AnteFa/BLM test runs

Expand full comment